AI Memory Verdict · Distributor lens · 2026-W19

Everyone agrees + deep supply → healthy

HOLDSTABLEAI ≈ buyer-search language· cos 0.85partial · missing OEM/DIST/AGG
▸ Panel signature · what AI saw, what we compared against
AI: 9 textsOEM: 0DIST: 0AGG: 0SEARCH: 10
cohort disagreement: 37.0%
1024-dimensional centroid embeddings · all numbers reproducible from methodology

Distributor action: channel consensus intact · maintain shelf-space.

photodetectors· level 3· tier B· leaf· 450 SKUs measured· 64 observations · 3 vantagesavailable

Where you rank in Photo Detectors

10 brands · 2026-W19

For each brand AI associates with this category, we record the rank (by AI-claim count) and which reference frame AI uses when talking about the brand. When the brand ahead of you appears in a different column than your marketing speaks, that's the campaign brief.

Category leaderboard · top 3
#1
panasonic.com
AI ≈ SEARCH
n=10
#2
vishay.com
AI ≈ SEARCH
n=3
#3
toshiba.semicon-storage.com
AI ≈ SEARCH
n=3

AI ≈ OEM

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in OEM-side terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ DIST

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in distributor-catalog terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ AGG

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in aggregator-discovery terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ SEARCH

10 brands

AI talks about these brands in buyer-search terms.slug cos 0.85

  • #2
    vishay.com
    n=3
    3/4 vantages
  • #5
    yageo.com
    n=2
    2/4 vantages
  • #5
    skyworksinc.com
    n=2
    2/4 vantages
  • #1
    panasonic.com
    n=10
    2/4 vantages
  • #3
    toshiba.semicon-storage.com
    n=3
    1/4 vantages
  • #7
    ttelectronics.com
    n=1
    1/4 vantages
rank = AI-claim count desc within the category · top 6 brands per reference frame · week 2026-W19
Buyer-search vocabulary · week 2026-W19
source · Google Keyword Planner data

What buyers actually search for — Photo Detectors

AI's vocabulary for this category is closest to buyer-search. These are the queries shaping that memory.

buyer querymonthly searchescompetition
avalanche photo diode110KLOW
photo detectors1.0KLOW
photodetectors1.0KLOW
photo detector1.0KLOW
detector photo1.0KLOW
photo multiplier720LOW
qwip480LOW
photo electric detector320HIGH
led as photodetector210HIGH
silicon photo multiplier210LOW
ranked desc by monthly searches · seed term dropped (always #1, uninteresting) · top 10 of 10 pulled · total monthly volume shown: 116K
peak: avalanche photo diode @ 110K searches/month · methodology and full caveats at /methodology
What you unlock

Photo Detectors — paid-tier surface

🔒 paid tier
38 brands competing here
Per-brand convergence scores, vantage coverage, full sourcing-card drill-down per brand.
7 brand category peers identified
Qwen-grounded peers with rationale, confidence, and verify_targets per peer.
48 manufacturing facilities · 37 brands · 10 countries
Geographic concentration, top brands by facility count, facility-type mix, supply-risk story.
Live week-over-week trajectory
Fragmentation direction, channel-pull attribution, drift narratives.
Anonymous visitors and crawlers see this preview. Sign in or subscribe to unlock the photodetectors data layer.
Sign in
Public preview · counts only · no brand names, scores, or specific facility data shown
New surface · paid tier
See Photo Detectors as a physics field.
Each of the 38 brands competing here becomes a particle, pulled toward the vantages that observed it. The shape of the cloud is the shape of fragmentation.
Open field view →
substrate · 21 weeks · 26.4M AI observations · 35,746 brands · 2025-W512026-W20
this page · 2026-W19 · numbers reproducible from our weekly substrate (methodology)
per-(brand × vantage × form) aggregation, top-form share within (brand × vantage) cells; divergence classified at category level using a 1024-dimensional embedding centroid.