AI Memory Verdict · OEM lens · 2026-W19

Everyone agrees + deep supply → healthy

HOLDDEFENDAI ≈ OEM language· cos 0.91partial · missing DIST/AGG
▸ Panel signature · what AI saw, what we compared against
AI: 2 textsOEM: 1DIST: 0AGG: 0SEARCH: 10
cohort disagreement: 32.8%
1024-dimensional centroid embeddings · all numbers reproducible from methodology

OEM action: AI hears you correctly · keep marketing investment intact.

level-shifters· level 2· tier B· leaf· 29,000 SKUs measured· 30 observations · 3 vantagesavailable

Where you rank in Level Shifters

3 brands · 2026-W19

For each brand AI associates with this category, we record the rank (by AI-claim count) and which reference frame AI uses when talking about the brand. When the brand ahead of you appears in a different column than your marketing speaks, that's the campaign brief.

Category leaderboard · top 3
#1
anaren.com
AI ≈ OEM
n=3
#2
skyworksinc.com
AI ≈ OEM
n=2
#3
mrcy.com
AI ≈ OEM
n=1

AI ≈ OEM

3 brands

AI talks about these brands in OEM-side terms.slug cos 0.91

  • #2
    skyworksinc.com
    n=2
    2/4 vantages
  • #1
    anaren.com
    n=3
    1/4 vantages
  • #3
    mrcy.com
    n=1
    1/4 vantages

AI ≈ DIST

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in distributor-catalog terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ AGG

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in aggregator-discovery terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ SEARCH

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in buyer-search terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.
rank = AI-claim count desc within the category · top 6 brands per reference frame · week 2026-W19
Buyer-search vocabulary · week 2026-W19
source · Google Keyword Planner data

What buyers actually search for — Level Shifters

AI's vocabulary for this category does not currently match buyer-search. These are the buyer queries — the language AI is not yet echoing.

buyer querymonthly searchescompetition
logic level shifter590MEDIUM
logic level converter260MEDIUM
logic shifter260LOW
i2c level shifter210HIGH
i2c level translator210HIGH
3.3 v to 5v level shifter170HIGH
bidirectional level shifter170MEDIUM
level translator 3.3 v to 5v170HIGH
mosfet level shifter140LOW
mosfet level translator140LOW
ranked desc by monthly searches · seed term dropped (always #1, uninteresting) · top 10 of 10 pulled · total monthly volume shown: 2.3K
peak: logic level shifter @ 590 searches/month · methodology and full caveats at /methodology
What you unlock

Level Shifters — paid-tier surface

🔒 paid tier
25 brands competing here
Per-brand convergence scores, vantage coverage, full sourcing-card drill-down per brand.
7 brand category peers identified
Qwen-grounded peers with rationale, confidence, and verify_targets per peer.
12 manufacturing facilities · 6 brands · 8 countries
Geographic concentration, top brands by facility count, facility-type mix, supply-risk story.
Live week-over-week trajectory
Fragmentation direction, channel-pull attribution, drift narratives.
Anonymous visitors and crawlers see this preview. Sign in or subscribe to unlock the level-shifters data layer.
Sign in
Public preview · counts only · no brand names, scores, or specific facility data shown
New surface · paid tier
See Level Shifters as a physics field.
Each of the 25 brands competing here becomes a particle, pulled toward the vantages that observed it. The shape of the cloud is the shape of fragmentation.
Open field view →
substrate · 21 weeks · 26.4M AI observations · 35,746 brands · 2025-W512026-W20
this page · 2026-W19 · numbers reproducible from our weekly substrate (methodology)
per-(brand × vantage × form) aggregation, top-form share within (brand × vantage) cells; divergence classified at category level using a 1024-dimensional embedding centroid.