AI Memory Verdict · Distributor lens · 2026-W19

Everyone agrees + deep supply → healthy

HOLDSTABLEAI ≈ aggregator language· cos 0.94partial · missing DIST
▸ Panel signature · what AI saw, what we compared against
AI: 7 textsOEM: 1DIST: 0AGG: 1SEARCH: 10
cohort disagreement: 11.8%
1024-dimensional centroid embeddings · all numbers reproducible from methodology

Distributor action: channel consensus intact · maintain shelf-space.

ldo-regulators· level 2· tier A· leaf· 48,110 SKUs measured· 49 observations · 4 vantagesavailable

Where you rank in LDO Regulators

5 brands · 2026-W19

For each brand AI associates with this category, we record the rank (by AI-claim count) and which reference frame AI uses when talking about the brand. When the brand ahead of you appears in a different column than your marketing speaks, that's the campaign brief.

Category leaderboard · top 3
#1
ti.com
AI ≈ AGG
n=4
#1
monolithicpower.com
AI ≈ AGG
n=4
#3
toshiba.semicon-storage.com
AI ≈ AGG
n=2

AI ≈ OEM

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in OEM-side terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ DIST

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in distributor-catalog terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.

AI ≈ AGG

5 brands

AI talks about these brands in aggregator-discovery terms.slug cos 0.94

  • #1
    ti.com
    n=4
    3/4 vantages
  • #1
    monolithicpower.com
    n=4
    3/4 vantages
  • #3
    toshiba.semicon-storage.com
    n=2
    1/4 vantages
  • #5
    maximintegrated.com
    n=1
    1/4 vantages
  • #3
    mrcy.com
    n=2
    1/4 vantages

AI ≈ SEARCH

0 brands

AI talks about these brands in buyer-search terms.

No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.
rank = AI-claim count desc within the category · top 6 brands per reference frame · week 2026-W19
Buyer-search vocabulary · week 2026-W19
source · Google Keyword Planner data

What buyers actually search for — LDO Regulators

AI's vocabulary for this category does not currently match buyer-search. These are the buyer queries — the language AI is not yet echoing.

buyer querymonthly searchescompetition
a ldo368KHIGH
ldo12KLOW
low dropout regulator12KLOW
dropout regulator12KLOW
ldo low dropout12KLOW
ldo low dropout regulator12KLOW
linear dropout regulator12KLOW
low dropout12KLOW
ldo motors590LOW
ldo voltage regulator390LOW
ranked desc by monthly searches · seed term dropped (always #1, uninteresting) · top 10 of 10 pulled · total monthly volume shown: 454K
peak: a ldo @ 368K searches/month · methodology and full caveats at /methodology
What you unlock

LDO Regulators — paid-tier surface

🔒 paid tier
29 brands competing here
Per-brand convergence scores, vantage coverage, full sourcing-card drill-down per brand.
7 brand category peers identified
Qwen-grounded peers with rationale, confidence, and verify_targets per peer.
5 manufacturing facilities · 5 brands · 4 countries
Geographic concentration, top brands by facility count, facility-type mix, supply-risk story.
Live week-over-week trajectory
Fragmentation direction, channel-pull attribution, drift narratives.
Anonymous visitors and crawlers see this preview. Sign in or subscribe to unlock the ldo-regulators data layer.
Sign in
Public preview · counts only · no brand names, scores, or specific facility data shown
New surface · paid tier
See LDO Regulators as a physics field.
Each of the 29 brands competing here becomes a particle, pulled toward the vantages that observed it. The shape of the cloud is the shape of fragmentation.
Open field view →
substrate · 21 weeks · 26.4M AI observations · 35,746 brands · 2025-W512026-W20
this page · 2026-W19 · numbers reproducible from our weekly substrate (methodology)
per-(brand × vantage × form) aggregation, top-form share within (brand × vantage) cells; divergence classified at category level using a 1024-dimensional embedding centroid.