AI Memory Verdict · OEM lens · 2026-W19
AI vantage missing — cannot classify; needs cohort substrate expansion
INSUFFICIENT_DATAINSUFFICIENT_DATAAI vantage missing
▸ Panel signature · what AI saw, what we compared against
AI: 6 textsOEM: 0DIST: 0AGG: 0SEARCH: 0
cohort disagreement: 17.9%
1024-dimensional centroid embeddings · all numbers reproducible from methodology
OEM action: panel too thin to classify · cohort substrate must expand.
bjts· level 3· tier B· leaf· 14,391 SKUs measured· 33 observations · 2 vantagesavailable
Brands AI associates with Bipolar Transistors (BJT)
No brand-attribution coverage in 2026-W19. Either the panel is below the meaningful-presence threshold or no brand has slug_closest_frame resolved here.
What you unlock
Bipolar Transistors (BJT) — paid-tier surface
◧26 brands competing here
Per-brand convergence scores, vantage coverage, full sourcing-card drill-down per brand.
◳2 manufacturing facilities · 2 brands · 2 countries
Geographic concentration, top brands by facility count, facility-type mix, supply-risk story.
◤Live week-over-week trajectory
Fragmentation direction, channel-pull attribution, drift narratives.
Anonymous visitors and crawlers see this preview. Sign in or subscribe to unlock the bjts data layer.
Sign inPublic preview · counts only · no brand names, scores, or specific facility data shown
New surface · paid tier
See Bipolar Transistors (BJT) as a physics field.
Each of the 26 brands competing here becomes a particle, pulled toward the vantages that observed it. The shape of the cloud is the shape of fragmentation.
substrate · 21 weeks · 26.4M AI observations · 35,746 brands · 2025-W51 → 2026-W20
this page · 2026-W19 · numbers reproducible from our weekly substrate (methodology)
per-(brand × vantage × form) aggregation, top-form share within (brand × vantage) cells; divergence classified at category level using a 1024-dimensional embedding centroid.