AI Memory Verdict · Broker lens · 2026-W19
AI consolidated + supply thin → hedge
HEDGEHEDGEAI ≈ buyer-search language· cos 0.87partial · missing OEM/DIST/AGG
▸ Panel signature · what AI saw, what we compared against
AI: 6 textsOEM: 0DIST: 0AGG: 0SEARCH: 10
cohort disagreement: 16.0%
1024-dimensional centroid embeddings · all numbers reproducible from methodology
Broker action: AI consolidated + supply thin · add second-flag supplier.
eeprom· level 3· tier A· leaf· 100,000 SKUs measured· 11 observations · 1 vantagesavailable
Where you rank in EEPROM
2 brands · 2026-W19For each brand AI associates with this category, we record the rank (by AI-claim count) and which reference frame AI uses when talking about the brand. When the brand ahead of you appears in a different column than your marketing speaks, that's the campaign brief.
Category leaderboard · top 3
#1n=2
winbond.com
AI ≈ SEARCH
#1n=2
macronix.com
AI ≈ SEARCH
AI ≈ OEM
0 brandsAI talks about these brands in OEM-side terms.
No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.
AI ≈ DIST
0 brandsAI talks about these brands in distributor-catalog terms.
No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.
AI ≈ AGG
0 brandsAI talks about these brands in aggregator-discovery terms.
No brand AI-anchored to this frame for this category.
AI ≈ SEARCH
2 brandsAI talks about these brands in buyer-search terms.slug cos 0.87
- #1winbond.comn=21/4 vantages
- #1macronix.comn=21/4 vantages
rank = AI-claim count desc within the category · top 6 brands per reference frame · week 2026-W19
Buyer-search vocabulary · week 2026-W19
source · Google Keyword Planner data
What buyers actually search for — EEPROM
AI's vocabulary for this category is closest to buyer-search. These are the queries shaping that memory.
buyer querymonthly searchescompetition
eeprom5.4KLOW
e eprom5.4KLOW
eeprom arduino210LOW
arduino with eeprom210LOW
eeprom and flash110MEDIUM
eeprom flash110MEDIUM
eeprom flash memory110MEDIUM
flash memory and eeprom110MEDIUM
eeprom memory90LOW
4096x890LOW
What you unlock
EEPROM — paid-tier surface
◧4 brands competing here
Per-brand convergence scores, vantage coverage, full sourcing-card drill-down per brand.
◳3 manufacturing facilities · 3 brands · 3 countries
Geographic concentration, top brands by facility count, facility-type mix, supply-risk story.
◤Live week-over-week trajectory
Fragmentation direction, channel-pull attribution, drift narratives.
Anonymous visitors and crawlers see this preview. Sign in or subscribe to unlock the eeprom data layer.
Sign inPublic preview · counts only · no brand names, scores, or specific facility data shown
New surface · paid tier
See EEPROM as a physics field.
Each of the 4 brands competing here becomes a particle, pulled toward the vantages that observed it. The shape of the cloud is the shape of fragmentation.
substrate · 21 weeks · 26.4M AI observations · 35,746 brands · 2025-W51 → 2026-W20
this page · 2026-W19 · numbers reproducible from our weekly substrate (methodology)
per-(brand × vantage × form) aggregation, top-form share within (brand × vantage) cells; divergence classified at category level using a 1024-dimensional embedding centroid.